Polycom OTX compare with Huawei TP3206 (OTX vs TP3206)
Article ID: 11
Last updated: 29 Aug, 2014
|
|
TP3206
|
OTX300
|
Advantages over Polycom OTX
|
|
Video
|
Huawei patented
co-optical-center camera
|
Hidden camera
|
lTP3206 employs co-optical-center camera stitching technology, thus the camera is not affected by the depth of field, enabling seamless stitching within various depth of field (DOF). OTX uses eagle-eye camera with smaller depth of field (DOF) only, which couldn’t cover two rows;
lTP3206 uses ultra-narrow bezel LED display to enable panoramic display;
lMain stream：TP3206 supports 1080p60, while OTX supports 720p60 only；
lContent：TP3206 supports 1080p30, while OTX supports 1024×768 7fps only；
lTP3206 has a better sound localization effect, while OTX can’t achieve precise sound localization and voice activation by screen as three-channel technology is not available；
lTP3206 has abundant conference-controlling functions which are basically not available for OTX
lTP3206 consumes less power and takes up less space, thus saving customers’ investment
|
|
3×55”ultra-narrow bezel displays
|
3×65”plasma displays
|
|
1080p 60
|
1080p 30
|
|
Audio
|
3 microphones；
AAC-LD three-channel
|
Ceiling-mounted MIC
|
|
Content
|
1080p 30fps
|
1024×768 7fps
|
|
Operation and control
|
10”wireless touch panel
Abundant conference-controlling functions
|
7”wired touch screen
Basically no conference-controlling functions available
|
|
Power consumption
|
1.7 kW
|
2.1 kW
|
|
Room requirements
|
20㎡
|
24.26㎡
|
